For very long time I have done: C-x b and then some "unique" name like xbxb
. So I use switch-to-buffer
with a non-existent buffer. You can imagine what C-x C-b shows me: Lots of such names. xbxb
, xbxbxxx
.... It really gets annoying after some time (a week or so), since I discover that I have already used all good names.
Is there a more canonical way of opening a new buffer? If I want to run a shell a further time, I say C-u M-x shell. Something along that line would be ideal.
No comments:
Post a Comment